The recent publication of the PCAST Health Information Technology Report:
Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward, published December 8, 2010 (
press release and covered in this
webcast) and became something of a Piñata for comments. Vince Kuratis did a great job of pulling these comments and responses together in his his blog
PCAST HIT Report Becomes a Political Piñata.
But Wes Rishell's post: "
PCAST Opportunity: Documents vs. “Atomic Data Elements” that reviews the PCAST recommendations and digs into the details of the development of standards and the basis for the exchange of information (documents vs snippets or Molecules/atoms), exchange formats and Universal ExchangeLanguage (UEL) vs HL7 CDA does an excellent job of dissecting out some of the controversies and homing in on exchange of data and the standards in question as well as highlighting the challenges associated with pre and post coordination of data (read less codes requirements and more code requirements). Interestingly Wes estimates
from 20,000 to 100,000 (data elements) but a number of physicians seem to agree that a very useful collection of molecules and radicals would contain many fewer than 20,000. Stan’s presentation describes several different parallel efforts to enumerate the molecules using siloed methodologies. The one he is working on as identified more than 4,000.
He points to several related posts - this from John Halamka:
Detailed Clinical Models that points to multiple other standards in development in other countries (Open EHR in Australia, ISO13972, Tolven's Open Source Clinical Data Definitions and the National Health Service Logical Record Architecture) which all adds up to a pressing need for a Universal Exchange Language...and in my mind translates to a significant challenge in developing and then keeping up to date.
Both blogs point to an excellent detailed (almost 2 hours) presentation by Stan Huff (CMIO at Intermountain Healthcare):
Practical Modeling issues: Representing Coded and Structured Patient Data in EHR Systems
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.